When division occurs, how do we handle that? What about political division? Within the grassroots movement, we don’t always agree. So what do we do when disagreement happens? Sometimes we assume agreement is the norm — and when someone disagrees, we treat it as a problem with them. But I think there’s something deeper going on that shouldn’t be overlooked.

At our core, we are not collectivists — we are individualists. That’s a strength, but it also explains a lot. The political left tends to fall in line because they operate as a collective. The right, on the other hand, often divides because we value independent thought. When we disagree, we don’t simply fall in line — we go our own direction. Nobody owns us, we think.

That means unity on the right doesn’t happen automatically. It happens when we genuinely agree on a cause and believe we can — and must — make a difference.

In South Dakota, we’ve seen that with issues like Summit, SB201, and Amendment G. Those moments brought people together because they created urgency and clarity. The stakes were obvious, and the need for action was shared.

But once those threats pass, something predictable happens. Unity fades. Clarity fades. And we return to our default setting — individualism.

That doesn’t mean we’re doomed. It just means we operate differently. We won’t be led effectively through pressure, shame, or manipulation over the long term. Those tactics might produce short bursts of unity, but they don’t last.

What does last?

“Trust me” isn’t enough. People engage differently — some need the big picture, others need the details. But everyone needs to be treated with respect, kindness, and basic courtesy.

That principle applies here more than we might like to admit.

The real challenge is overcoming inertia. Left to ourselves, the default is often inaction or fragmentation. We need a clear vision. We need trust that is earned, not assumed. We need a compelling reason to act and a solution that is both credible and competent.

And yet, even when those things are within reach, the process often breaks down. Why? Because we’re human. We take offense. We resist scrutiny. We don’t like being questioned. We struggle to admit when we’re wrong. And when those tensions rise, it’s easier to divide — or tear everything down — than to work through them.

That’s not just a political issue. That’s a human issue.

Continue reading: Why Political Renewal Requires Spiritual Renewal →

— Pastor Mike Boyle